Search This Blog

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Story and Topic Perspective of Multimedia Reporting on 5 Real Events


Story and Topic Perspective of Multimedia Reporting on 5 Real Events

1.      Recalls
Story: Toyota Recalls, saying it would immediately stop selling the Camry, Corolla and Avalon sedans, Matrix wagon, RAV4 crossover, Tundra pickup, and Highlander and Sequoia sport utility vehicles.

Topic: Car Recalls include different makers and models in the past five years, for example, listing the problems, and their fixes in articles, pictures, videos, interviews with car owners, manufacturers, and experts, mechanics, salespeople, government agency such as National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; accidents in different regions using interactive maps supported by researchable data.



(Source: NYTimes.com)

2.      .Wildfires
(Source: Boston.com)
Topic: Wildfires in California in history, regions, causes and investigation results, in pictures videos, and writings, based on interviews with residents affected by the fires, and firefighters, experts in the field. And if possible, in comparison with epidemic wildfires in Australia.

3.      China Political Prisoners (of Conscience)
(Source: Canyu.org)
Story: Liu Xiaobo-who he is, what he did in the past; charges of his 11-year-sentence; worldwide reaction to his indication
Topic: political environment in Communist China; political prisoners in history under the Communist rule since 1949, and their status updates –death, release, re-education camps using graphics, and maps indicating where these prisons were/are; memoirs of sufferings of prisoners and family members using pictures and videos, and message board for those still missing, interviews with former political prisoners or prisoners of conscience, and the comments by experts. Today’s Chinese prisoners of conscience, including journalists being jailed for investigative reporting, and for exercising their constitutional rights of “freedom of expression”, etc. , using twitter, facebook, youtube, and other contemporary multimedia techiniques, revealing their stories to the world community.

4.      Google China
Story: Google’s China move-Google operation in China, censorship policy fact check; Google claims and background reporting, Google.cn is the best example, using online groups for discussions, netizens’ reaction to the issue, US and Chinese government responses, etc.
Topic: Internet Freedom vs. Internet Censorship, to discuss the nature of the Internet, benefits and imperfects such as child pornography, Censorship policies in some countries, particularly in Communist China, where there is a government-led institutional, systematic practice of censorship, with self-censorship by businesses under the government pressure; fight over the freedom of information on the Internet; technological support to proxy software for netizens blocked by the firewall; Internet freedom and the “digital diplomacy” and “digital democracy”; maps indicating the censorship intensity; audio/video, online  interviews with Internet experts on censorship situations, and its future, etc.  

5.      Steve Jobs
(Source: Time.com)
Topic: Steve Jobs’ inspiring enterprenueruer career  and Apple’s breakthrough products including Mac, iPhone, iPod, iPad, despite the dotcome bubble in late 1990s, and current economic meltdown, using graphics displaying the products over the past 20 years, and its impact on the industry; Steve Jobs’ role in Apple, comparing the company before and after his departure, and his return to reinvent the company he co-founded.  Interviews with Mac fans and foes, IT experts, in audio, video and texting, all in an interactive platform.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

The State of the News -Online

For more information, please visit,

http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2009/printable_online_chapter.htm

The State of the News-2009

The State of the News Media 2009 is the sixth edition of our annual report on the health and status of American journalism.
Our goals are to take stock of the revolution occurring in how Americans get information and provide a resource for citizens, journalists and researchers to make their own assessments. To do so we gather in one place as much data as possible about all the major sectors of journalism, identify trends, mark key indicators, note areas for further inquiry.
For each area we have produced original research and aggregated existing data into a narrative on the state of journalism that we hope is the most comprehensive anywhere. Statistical data also exists in an interactive format (see our index of charts), which allows users to customize their own graphics. The report also includes A Year in the News, a comprehensive content analysis of media performance based on more than 70,000 stories from 48 news outlets across five media sectors, as well as a special look at Hispanic and African American media and an Interactive Topline that lets users explore the data for themselves. This year’s study also includes special reports on Lessons of the Election, New Ventures online, a content analysis of Citizen Media in 46 communities. And coming soon: a Survey of Online Journalists and a look back at Campaign Coverage.
This report is the work of the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism, a nonpolitical, nonpartisan research institute. The study is funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts and was produced with the help of a number of authors and collaborators , including Rick Edmonds of the Poynter Institute and a host of industry readers.
The full report is comprehensive, totaling nearly 180,000 words.


For more information, please visit: http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2009/index.htm

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

A Short Analysis of Multimedia Coverage of Haitian Earthquake

Since Haiti was hit by the catastrophe on January 12, 2010, all media, print, broadcast and online have been covering the development around the clock.

One of the best multimedia coverage, as I can tell, is the New York Times's website, with a special project called "Haiti Earthquake Multimedia", (http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/01/17/world/americas/haiti-earthquake-multimedia.html), where you can find photography, videos, audios, and interactive graphic materials, from day one to the latest.

Let's take a look at these different components:

(1)Assessing the Damage in Haiti, http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/01/18/world/americas/0118-haiti-assess-maps.html#tab=0, where there are four sections: The Scene, Building Damage, Temporary Shelter, and Road Debris for readers to look into each section for more information.

(2)Devastation and Survival Along Avenue Poupelard, http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/01/24/world/haiti-street.html, which shows a place on a map with a more closer picture to follow, along with texts to provide more information.

(3)Many video clips on many different aspects of the disaster in Haiti, like this http://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/01/13/world/americas/1247466532047/haiti-s-legacy-of-environmental-disaster.html, but I NEVER LIKE ITS "Staples" ADS before the contents; it's dramatic and in funny tone, and is out of line with the tragical atmosphere.

(4)Rescuers Race Clock in Haiti, http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/01/15/world/20100115-HAITI_3.html, with so many shocking photos.

(5) Video information on "Haiti Quake Day 5: Tensions Rising", http://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/01/16/world/americas/1247466582363/haiti-quake-day-5-tensions-rising.html

(6)On Jan 22, "The Missing in Haiti"(http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/01/14/world/haiti-missing-people.html) provides a place for people to look for their relatives/friends, employees, and so on. More information available by clicking on the picture.

(7) On Jan 26, a new section was created "Perspectives on Haiti's Earthquake"(http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/haitivoices.html)-for people, such as journalists, and academics, to reflect on this event.

All in all, these 40 sections provide a comprehensive information about the earthquake in the island country.

Without multimedia technologies, the information cannot be available in such rich medium to readers/audiences almost simultaneously.

As we all know, the first information about the earthquake was sent out on Twitter! Surely, anyone on the scene can be a "citizen reporter" if he/she has a digital camera, and a cellphone with access to the Internet.

Of course, many other news organizations also provide timely information with multimedia tools, including,

USA TODAY, http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/haiti-timeline-interactive.htm,

CNN Special Coverage: http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2010/haiti.quake/; Christiane Amanpour is in Haiti, along with other reporters.

CBS does not have a special coverage on the earthquake, but has a lot of reporting on the development.

ABC provides a special coverage, http://abcnews.go.com/International/HaitiEarthquake/, with a small number of sections, though.

MSNBC has a topic on "Haiti", http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34748828, but does not input so much, I have to say. A lot of outside links are provides on the topic page.

Huffington Post created a special coverage with a title "Some News is so big it needs its own page", http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/haiti-earthquake, including a blog on this quake.


From my readings over the past two weeks on Haiti, I find all news organizations have maintain their journalistic values in carrying out their performance. News values such as impact, timeliness, prominence, conflict, proximity, currency are all reflected in their coverage.

My question is on technologies. How does a news organization employ so many talents and resources on a special coverage when breaking news happen, and how do the editors and reporters coordinate their working relations in such urgent conditions? What stories come first and with what kind of background supporting materials, like video, and audio, and interviews with relevant experts in the field? and so on...

Hope the class can discuss these issues with the professor in our next class.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

WSJ: Web Access Is New Clinton Doctrine

* JANUARY 20, 2010





By SIOBHAN GORMAN

The U.S. plans to make unrestricted access to the Internet a top foreign-policy priority, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton plans to announce Thursday.

The announcement, which has been scheduled for weeks, comes in the wake of accusations last week that Chinese hackers penetrated Google Inc.'s computer networks. The attack, which also targeted Chinese dissidents, is the kind of issue Mrs. Clinton aims to address, said Alec Ross, a senior adviser.

The growing role of the Internet in foreign policy became clear last year during protests in Iran after allegations of election fraud. The government tried to crack down on protesters' Internet communications, but they circumvented digital blockades to send out video and Twitter messages about violence against demonstrators.

In one new initiative, the State Department plans to offer financial support to grass-roots movements that promote Internet freedom, Mr. Ross said.

Mrs. Clinton also hopes to diminish the "honor" beatings and killings of women in the Middle East by family members who discover they are using social media on the Internet, such as Facebook or Twitter, he said.

Mrs. Clinton sees Internet freedom as critical to America's longstanding promotion of democracy abroad, Mr. Ross added. She aims to shrink the proportion of the global population, now 30%, who live in countries that censor the Internet, he said.

"When we sit across the table from governments and talk about what matters to us, this is now on the table," Mr Ross said.

Other initiatives will include State Department funding for pilot technology programs to promote goals like government transparency, Mr. Ross said. One example could be providing funding for a Web site that allows citizens to rate aspects of their government—much like restaurant reviews are posted on the Internet—to publicize experiences such as bribery.

The initiatives build on ad hoc decisions made last year during the Iranian protests, such as the State Department's decision to ask Twitter to delay a planned upgrade at the time to ensure protesters could continue to get their message out.

They also mirror policies State has been advocating at the United Nations, where it has been fending off Russian and Chinese efforts to restrict access to information on the Internet on the grounds of national sovereignty, according to people familiar with the talks.

In recent months, both Russia and China have signaled a willingness to negotiate on cybersecurity. In November, a top-level Russian delegation met with U.S. officials about cybersecurity for the first time. Russian officials have also been trying to link up U.S. and Russian academics to study how the laws of war and international law might apply in cyberspace.

Last month, representatives from a think tank associated with Chinese security services met with U.S. cybersecurity experts to diffuse tensions over U.S. allegations of spying.

The State Department has also organized delegations of U.S. executives for trips to Baghdad and Mexico City to share thoughts on how new technologies could be best used in rebuilding the Iraqi government and fighting drug violence. "I've never experienced such government involvement before" in promoting technology internationally, said Jack Dorsey, Twitter co-founder and chairman.

Mrs. Clinton's elevation of Internet freedom could signal an important foreign policy shift, said Andrew Rasiej, founder of the Personal Democracy Forum, an annual conference on technology and policy. "This signals a critical shift in moving U.S. foreign policy from a 20th century world view to a 21st century reality," he said.

Advocacy groups supporting Iranian dissidents cheered the new initiatives. "It's a very significant development," said Brett Solomon, executive director of AccessNow.org, a group that has helped dissidents get videos and communications past Iranian Internet barricades. "It underlies the power of new technology to shift the political agenda."

Write to Siobhan Gorman at siobhan.gorman@wsj.com

Friday, January 15, 2010

A Few Thoughts on Managing Multimedia Projects

Living in a digital globe, we are becoming more and more digitalized the way we live, and the way we work.

For journalists, today's industry is getting digital by the minute. Print or broadcast media are all becoming digital ones.

The New York Times, for example, has a wonderful website: you can read the news stories, listen to and watch its podcasts, free, day and night, in the air or on the beach. It is a multimedia platform to engage with both editor, journalists and the audiences!

That is why I am taking this multimedia course at Georgetown University, and other courses with focus on multimedia techniques.

From the first class on Thursday, Jan. 14, 2010, I learned a bit more about the teaching plan, and I must say, I like it very much. And I would be honest with myself, this is the most pleasant first class I have even taken in years - relaxing, and interactive, and eye-opening!

I like Professor Carlos Roig's "Big Idea" in managing multimedia projects, as I've always feel like to see a forest rather than a tree over the years. Of course, I realize that with so much in detail to achieve before any multimedia projects can be done successfully.

Having said that, I am expecting to gain not only strategic mindset in initiating multimedia projects, but feasible management skills that I can apply to my journalistic work,and beyond.

Of course, to take on any multimedia project will require team work, ideally with expertise on sound, video and still image management, as projects are getting more and more complicated.

With my years of practicing journalism in both traditional broadcast media and website, blogging, and twittering, along with newly-acquired skills in video production, I am confident that the "Managing Multimedia Projects" class will be very productive in spring 2010.

Here are some of my favorite websites that show excellent multimedia ideas:

http://www.nytimes.com/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/
http://journalism.berkeley.edu/
http://www.virginia.edu/
http://web.mit.edu/
http://www.whitehouse.gov/